Ideology: Stubb vs. Fleece1) What was most difficult and thought provoking at the same time I think when Stubb was abusing Fleece on the state of his whale steak and how it was cooked. To be honest, [it] was also kind of annoying as well[, mostly] because of the abusive talk that Stubb used and how he put Fleece down on how to cook and how to act as a black man[, which] I hated when reading the chapter.
2) However jovial [Stubb] may
seem, he also is self-important. His crew brings back the whale they killed,
which only furthers Ahab’s bad mood. He retreats into his cabin, and Stubb
becomes insufferable. He demands a "steak" be cut from the whale. He wakes the
cook up to prepare it, and then criticizes the cook. The cook is a black man,
and Stubb treats him with no respect. This isn’t shocking given the time
period, but it seems like it goes against the previous statements made about
whaling. Fleece (the cook) says that he is about ninety years old. There is no
telling how many of those years he’s been a cook… yet Stubb has the audacity to
tell him how to do his job.
Ideology: Fleece vs. Enlightenment? Transcendentalism?
3) … the [text] seemed to make a satire of Enlightenment values, as Fleece the cook leaned over the ship and was forced [by Stubb] to preach to a mass of hungry sharks devouring globules of whale . . . [an] appeal in which he was to make the attempt of calming the gluttonous mass by shouting things like “Your woraciousness, fellow-critters, I don’t blame ye so much for; dat is natur . . . but to gobern dat wicked nature, dat is de pint” (Ch. 64). In this line, Fleece mocks Enlightenment values by showing the non-effect its ideals on personal nature have on the hungering mass that is society. . . . when Fleece tells the sharks “Don’t be tearin de blubber out your neighbor’s mout” (Ch. 64), the sharks, even if they could understand Fleece, would ignore his request, as the creatures voracious nature requires a particluar kind of ‘self-reliance’ to even survive in their harsh, submerged world.
From: Melville: His World and His Work ( 2005) by Andrew Delbanco
"...Melville's retort to romantic dreamers whose belief in the 'all-controlling and all-permeating wonderfulness' of the world (his parodic paraphrase of Emerson) blinds them to the truth that nature is nothing but a vast blankness on which man inscribes his fantasies."
"The Gulf Stream" (1899) by Winslow Homer
Aesthetics: The Reader is a Sailor
4) The point of these chapters could simply be
to innocently give the reader a better understanding of the things that whalers
get up to at sea. Or it could be an attempt by Melville to prolong the story,
to give the reader a similar feeling to how the characters feel. For the
sailors and Ishmael, the voyage they are on is a long journey over the course
of several years. Melville may be trying to give the reader a sense of this in
these chapters. For the characters, this journey is not simply from point A to
point B. It is full of stops along the way and other events that may be too
unimportant to include in the novel. In providing these brief chapters of extra
information, Melville is prolonging the story for the reader. Just as it may
feel for the characters involved.
Ideology: Sailors as Sharks
5) Chapter 66 discusses how the sharks
use the whale they just caught to hold a feeding frenzy that Queequeg almost
loses a hand in. However, during the feeding frenzy it’s noted that the sharks
“viciously snapped, not only at each other’s disembowelment… and bit their own”
which could be foreshadowing that the crew will turn on one another at some
point for, just a chapter earlier, Fleece was comparing the crew to wicked
sharks (Ch. 66).
Ideology: A disturbing Ritual Sabbath?
6) . . . a line that caught my attention was when the narrator said someone would have thought they were “offering up ten thousand red oxen to the sea gods” referring to the tale of Odysseus and the titan Helios’s prized red oxen (ch.67). In the tale when the oxen were killed to placate the sea and allow them passage, Helios was enraged and had Zeus destroy Odysseus’ ship and crew leaving him alone. This could potentially be further foreshadowing that the crew isn’t going to make this cursed voyage.
7) Later they enter a ‘gab’ with another whaling
ship known as the Jeroboam, currently under quarantine from some disease
potentially causing hallucinations and delirium. One of their crew that appears
to be heavily affected by the illness entered a state of “insanity” making him
believe that he’s the “archangel Gabriel” (ch.71). This insanity the
crewmate is undergoing makes me think of Ahab’s obsession with Moby Dick.
Despite it not being a disease, it’s practically eating him alive as if it were.
Ideology: Cosmopolitanism
8) This book is often held up as an example of
successful cosmopolitan ideals, but occasionally comments will pop up in the
book where the reader questions some of these characters’ attitudes towards
other cultures, and therefore cosmopolitanism itself. For example, in chapter 66, Queequeg’s hand is almost taken off by a shark,
and he remarks that he doesn’t care for the shark or whichever god made it
because “…de god watmade shark must be one dam Ingin” (Ch. 66). Queequeg
had already been shown to be tolerant of Ishmael’s Christian faith, and he
even says in this chapter that he wouldn’t have cared if the shark’s creator
had been a “Fejee god or Nantucket god,”, but that is where the tolerance ends
(Ch. 66). He very clearly does not like Native Americans, but why? How
much contact has he had with the natives of mainland America? It almost makes
the reader wonder if he picked up on this prejudice from the people around him
rather than developing an opinion from any extensive experience with native
peoples. And if Queequeg’s opinion can be swayed by the society he lives in,
which we know was overall incredibly racist, does this undercut the book’s
theme of cosmopolitanism?
9) Chapter 67 begins with Ishmael
saying “It was a Saturday night, and such a Sabbath as followed!” (Ch. 67)
Then he describes how the crew broke their Sabbath oath by hacking up a whale,
a process which he compares to the offering of cattle to “the sea gods” (Ch. 67). I think this is a very interesting analogy, since Ishmael lives in a
predominantly Christian society, and Ishmael is a Christian himself. He’s
already been shown in the book partaking in a pagan ritual with Queequeg,
something that would cause many a Christian at that time (and now tbh) to
dramatically clutch their pearls and faint on the nearest chaise. Ishmael has
some hang ups with the idea of having to stick to a rulebook when it comes to
religion (much like Dickinson and [Emerson]), so breaking the Sabbath or
participating in pagan rituals does not seem like sacrilege to Ishmael even
though it would to some other Christians. Ishmael has the capacity to coexist
alongside other [beliefs] and actively participate in them without forsaking his
own. This implies a positive example of cosmopolitanism. Honestly, my first
paragraph was about a failed example of cosmopolitanism and this one is about a
successful example. And the quotes I pulled from the book are only a paragraph
apart themselves. It’s giving me whiplash. But it has also helped me see that
this book is probably meant to be less one-sided propaganda for cosmopolitanism
and more of a discussion of cosmopolitanism, and how it is an idyllic society that
we aim for but haven’t perfected yet (evidence in the behavior of Queequeg and
the Spanish sailor).
Ideology: Ahab's Reverence for the Whale Head
10) . . . this is how [Ahab] speaks of the whale head, “"Speak, thou vast and venerable head, which, though ungarnished with a beard, yet here and there lookest hoary with mosses; speak, mighty head, and tell us the secret thing that is in thee. Of all divers, thou hast dived the deepest. That head upon which the upper sun now gleams, has moved amid this world's foundations,” (Chapter 70) which, ironically, is a stark contrast to the very technical, analytical ways of interaction between the crew (by majority) and the whale.